Late Bronze Age Superman

In my readings of 80s DC Comics from 1980 to Crisis, I've noticed DC slowly shedding its Bronze Age character and developing greater similarities with Marvel--at least as far as mainstream superhero titles. In some important ways DC fostered experimentation that would be instrumental in establishing the "modern age" of comics. But as titles like Firestorm, the Teen Titans, and to some degree Justice League of America become less distinguishable from Marvel's output, I feel like Superman retains a character uniquely its own.

It's hard precisely to define. I think Marvel boosters would pounce on the Swan art and the plots based on tricks or surprise reveals and say they're old fashion--and sure, those things are holdovers from earlier eras. But the content of these stories hasn't stayed static. Superman doesn't become grim or gritty by any means, but the sophistication of its plot elements or concepts is no less than the average of other DC or Marvel Comics of the era. 

What's most noticeable is that there is less violence in the Superman titles than probably any title at Marvel or the more Marvel-like DC titles. This doesn't mean there isn't any action. Superman is all the time doing some sort of physical feat and he does fight with villains/threats, but violence is seldom the solution and sometimes Superman takes the course of taking some licks instead of fighting back.

The oft-repeated belief of a lot of (non-Superman) fans is that it's hard to tell stories with him because he's too powerful, too strong. I don't think this is the case. Let's be honest: handbook-style strength quantification is a new thing and a haphazardly applied one. Any strength-as-their-main-schtick character has fairly broad parameters to be as strong or as weak as they need to be for any given story. The Hulk is no less "strong" in the narrative sense than is Superman. If the writers wanted Superman to be "the strongest there is" they could throw a whole bunch of punch 'em up villains at him of escalating levels of astronomical strength. It's not like that has never happened in Superman's history, but that isn't the approach taken in these years by Wolfman, Bates, and Maggin, and I think they are perhaps wise for not doing so.

 That sort of story wouldn't really showcase Superman as a guy defined more by not using overwhelming force. He's Superman, not Strongman. She instead, they write stories where super-strength can be displayed and may even be useful but isn't the best solution. Superman overcomes his obstacles by smart and judicious application of his powers. He couldn't prevail without them, but neither their multiplicity nor potency is the primary factor.

The other thing is they aren't afraid to have allies show up and make trouble for him. Occasionally Superman engages in the old trope of fighting another hero, but usually he's taking their blows to by time to figure out what's going on. The arrival of Vartox or deep cuts like Valdemar takes some diplomacy on Superman's part. He can't just beat them to unconsciousness and call it a day.

All of this sort of went away to a large degree with the Byrne revamp, I feel like. Could this have been viable, alternative style for a modern Superman? I'm not sure.